2 Issues for 2019: social value and biodiversity net gains
Published on 7 Feb 2019
The importance of sustainable real assets has become increasingly evident through the positive impact they can have on returns for investors/owners as well as future proofing the value of the investment. Issues such as energy efficiency are often an initial target, in part due to the ease with which improvement can be measured. More recently, wider ranging issues such as climate change resilience, lifecycle considerations and health and wellbeing have received greater attention. Health and wellbeing is an important consideration given the amount of time spent in buildings, with various pieces of research highlighting the benefits to staff productivity of a healthy office, thus making them more attractive to prospective tenants.
It’s not just the asset itself that needs to be sustainable. Asset owners are becoming increasingly aware of the third ‘arm’ of sustainability: their social responsibility and the need to consider impacts of their asset on the wider surroundings. As part of this, this article considers in greater detail two issues that are expected to receive increased attention during 2019: social value and biodiversity net gains.
Social value
Social
value aims to ensure that an asset brings about the maximum social benefit to
local people, businesses and communities. It has become clear that a focus on
social value can lead to a number of positive impacts, including healthier
lifestyles, creating a sense of community and employment opportunities. It is
also a way of encouraging stakeholders to work collaboratively, as well as
ensure that assets are futureproofed by considering that local communities will
evolve over time and thus, developments need to respond to this.
It
is evident that social value is becoming a key part of the development process
with awareness growing across the industry. Developers are incorporating it
into their businesses and projects as well as asset owners understanding that
it is important to consider the needs and wants of the building users.
Furthermore, there is an understanding among stakeholders that considering the
social value of a development will be of benefit to them as well as the wider
community.
The
rise of social value has generated discussions about the challenge of
measuring, monitoring and quantifying it, and there is confusion over who is
responsible for capturing the data. As a
result, it is hard to achieve consistency across the industry with measuring
social value. Despite these challenges, recent trends towards the development
of build to rent within the residential market has led to long term community
benefit becoming an important part of the development process. This has
subsequently resulted in an ability to capture social value data through being
long term custodians of, and recipients of returns from assets they construct. Understanding
how occupiers feel about the buildings in which they live or work allows for
adjustments to be made to ensure a high quality product over the greatest
timeframe.
Over
the coming year, making reporting more consistent will be vital to ensure that
data is comparable, particularly as stakeholders request greater transparency
on social value. We are expecting to see asset owners and developers becoming
bolder in setting out exactly what social value means to them, how they intend
to measure success and reporting on true, additionality as a result of their
actions.
Biodiversity net gains
From a biodiversity perspective in 2019, the
phrase on everyone’s lips will be Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG). As a concept
this has gained traction over recent years, having been widely accepted by
industry leaders, with some having already embedded the requirement within
internal policy. A handful of planning authorities, including London and
Warwickshire, have also been leading the way with progressive policy
requirements. Many areas, however, are still failing with respect to
their protection and improvement of biodiversity under the status quo.
Government accordingly launched a consultation in late 2018 outlining their
proposed mandate for BNG within planning. The consultation will close on the 10th
February 2019 and we expect BNG to become mainstream in some form over the next
year or two.
The proposed mandate would roll out the need
to deliver measurable gains for biodiversity on all new development schemes that
require planning (excluding nationally significant infrastructure projects and
house extensions). This would utilise an amended version of the existing Defra
Biodiversity Metric, which would aim to sit comfortably within the existing
survey, design and decision-making process, avoiding undue cost or added
complexity for developers.
In all, it appears to be a positive action to
redress our impact upon nature, whilst providing a clear framework for
developers. It stands to aid decision-making, public relations and the design
process, as well as improving the resilience, functionality and quality of real
estate.
Specifically, having the mechanism to quantify
biodiversity value should remove any ambiguity with respect to the appropriate
scale and nature of mitigation, compensation and enhancement design
interventions; the approach will allow for clarity on area and habitat type to
be protected or recreated, creating a level playing field for all scales of
development. There will be a focus on the provision of habitats amongst new
development, ensuring that we embed nature where we need it most, rather than
keeping it in designated areas away from where we live and work. The health,
wellbeing and ecosystem service benefits as a consequence of this therefore
stand to be significant, reflecting wider industry trends relating to quality
placemaking designed with occupant’s wellbeing in mind.
In practice, the primary change in the first
instance will be the need for ecologists to include a measure of baseline
biodiversity units at a site during their baseline assessments. This will then
be able to help inform site layout and design, identifying the predicted loss
of units as a result of proposals as they evolve. Differing scenarios can then
be drawn up to enable an overall gain in units, preferably achieved on-site.
This approach will not change the existing approach to protected species or the
mitigation hierarchy (where schemes must first avoid and then if not possible,
minimise, remediate or finally compensate for impacts) but will more clearly
identify risk, area need or cost for delivering a scheme from the outset.
Conclusion
It is clear that developers and asset owners are
considering an increasingly wide range of issues, both as a result of
legislation and industry direction. Social value and biodiversity net gain are
two such issues that, as a result of the development of metrics to quantify and
monitor them, developers will increasingly consider in order to maximise the
sustainability of their assets whilst creating better value.
Laura Thrower
Graduate Consultant at Greengage Environmental Ltd.
Related insights
Articles
Why it pays to consider the environment: Joining the dots between climate risk and biodiversity gain
Thankfully the climate emergency and biodiversity crisis have finally entered the collective consciousness. We acknowledge their existence and their fundamental importance. They are the reasons we do what we do as environmental professionals, but we rarely equate them, in either practical terms or in the common ‘sustainability consultancy parlance’, forgetting the crucial point that these two existential risks are not mutually exclusive.
As the ongoing Covid-19 crisis demonstrates, the ability to understand risk and understanding the impacts and mitigation has been underestimated by a number of businesses and governments around the world. The same can be said of how climate risk is conceived across the economic and political sphere.
Circular economy and the notion that we cannot continue to deplete resources indefinitely is now at the forefront of the discussion by those that design and operate buildings. The principles of designing out waste, keeping materials in use and regenerating natural systems are now more clearly understood and methods more readily available than ever before.